Does the SEC Have the Authority To Regulate Digital Art?
Should artists have to file paperwork with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) just to sell their own creations? Should they be required to warn buyers that art values might fluctuate? Should the SEC get to say if art sales count as an “investment”? Does the SEC have the regulatory authority to police art sales? The SEC seems to think it does—if the art is a nonfungible token (NFT).
As a federal lawsuit against the SEC explains, NFTs are digital tokens stored on a blockchain that “can give the owner a wide array of digital and/or physical rights.” Think of an NFT as a digital collector’s item, designed to be one of a kind.
The plaintiffs in that lawsuit, musician Jonathan Mann (known online as songadaymann) and conceptual artist Brian L. Frye, want to continue selling NFTs, but they worry that the SEC under Chairman Gary Gensler will try to stop them. Mann and Frye, who filed their lawsuit last July in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, were alarmed by recent SEC actions against other NFT artists that resulted in punishing settlements. They are seeking an injunction barring the SEC from bringing similar enforcement actions against them
Article from Reason.com
The Reason Magazine website is a go-to destination for libertarians seeking cogent analysis, investigative reporting, and thought-provoking commentary. Championing the principles of individual freedom, limited government, and free markets, the site offers a diverse range of articles, videos, and podcasts that challenge conventional wisdom and advocate for libertarian solutions. Whether you’re interested in politics, culture, or technology, Reason provides a unique lens that prioritizes liberty and rational discourse. It’s an essential resource for those who value critical thinking and nuanced debate in the pursuit of a freer society.
