Harris Attacks Trump for a Foreign Policy Proposal Backed by Her Own Advisors
The foreign policy debate this year has been an exercise in Democrats and Republicans trying to outhawk each other. Gone are the days when both parties pretended to be interested in ending “endless wars.” Now, Vice President Kamala Harris insists that former President Donald Trump was a weakling for avoiding nuclear war with North Korea, while Trump claims that he would have kept U.S. forces in Afghanistan in order to fight China.
This week, the Harris campaign brought up a new line of attack. Trump is too willing to lift economic sanctions on Iran and Russia, based on comments he made on Thursday. But four years ago, Harris’ own national security adviser, Phil Gordon, had attacked Trump for being too unwilling to lift sanctions. And the current Secretary of the Treasury, Janet Yellen, agrees with Trump’s position on the downside of sanctions.
In a Thursday speech to The Economic Club of New York, Trump bragged that “I was a user of sanctions, but I put them on and take them off as quickly as possible, because ultimately it kills your dollar and kills everything the dollar represents. We have to continue to have that be the world currency.” He added, “You’re losing Iran. You’re losing Russia. China is out there trying to get their currency to be the dominant currency.”
Trump was echoing a common (and obvious) criticism made by economists. Cutting enemies off from the U.S. financial system can do serious economic damage to targets because most international trade is conducted in U.S. dollars. But the more the U.S. government uses these sanctions, and the wider its list of targets, the more foreign countries will start looking for Washington-proof alternatives to the dollar, a process known as “dedollarization.”
China has already created an alternative market for buying Russian and Iranian oil, which is under U.S. and European sanctions.Â
Trump’s warning wasn’t that different from what the Biden-Harris administration had admitted last year. “There is a risk when we use financial sanctions that are linked to the role of the dollar, that over time it could undermine the hegemony of the dollar,” Yellen, the treasury secretary, told CNN in April 2023. “But this is an extremely important tool that we try to use judiciously.”
The Harris campaign sang a different tune on Thursday. “Unilaterally lifting sanctions on Iran and Russia is the exact kind of reckless foreign policy we’ve come to expect from Donald Trump, who would make America weak and the world less safe,” said Morgan Finkelstein, national security spokeswoman for the Harris campaign, in a statement.
The key word is “unilaterally.” Trump has said before that he wants to cut deals with Russia and Iran. Rather than saying that he would lift sanctions on Russia and Iran for the sake of it, Trump seems to be implying that he wants to trade U.S. economic leverage for Russian and Iranian concessions on important issues—in theory, the same policy as t
Article from Reason.com
The Reason Magazine website is a go-to destination for libertarians seeking cogent analysis, investigative reporting, and thought-provoking commentary. Championing the principles of individual freedom, limited government, and free markets, the site offers a diverse range of articles, videos, and podcasts that challenge conventional wisdom and advocate for libertarian solutions. Whether you’re interested in politics, culture, or technology, Reason provides a unique lens that prioritizes liberty and rational discourse. It’s an essential resource for those who value critical thinking and nuanced debate in the pursuit of a freer society.