Federal Judge Recognizes the Right To Train AI on Copyrighted Works
Judge William Alsup of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled Monday that Anthropic did not violate the Copyright Act by training its large language model (LLM) on copyrighted books so long as those books were legally acquired. This case is one of many filed against artificial intelligence (AI) companies for the way in which their LLMs use copyrighted material. In this case, Alsup ruled that AI companies have the right to train large language models on copyrighted material to produce original content, the same way people do.
Bartz v. Anthropic was filed in August 2024 on behalf of a class of fiction and nonfiction authors, alleging that Anthropic had built its business by “stealing hundreds of thousands of copyrighted books.” The authors alleged that Anthropic downloaded known pirated versions of the plaintiffs’ works, in violation of the Copyright Act, without compensating them. Central to the plaintiffs’ complaint is the claim that Anthropic’s “Claude LLMs compromise authors’ ability to make a living” by allowing “anyone to generate—automatically and freely (or very cheaply
Article from Reason.com
The Reason Magazine website is a go-to destination for libertarians seeking cogent analysis, investigative reporting, and thought-provoking commentary. Championing the principles of individual freedom, limited government, and free markets, the site offers a diverse range of articles, videos, and podcasts that challenge conventional wisdom and advocate for libertarian solutions. Whether you’re interested in politics, culture, or technology, Reason provides a unique lens that prioritizes liberty and rational discourse. It’s an essential resource for those who value critical thinking and nuanced debate in the pursuit of a freer society.
