Will Jay Bhattacharya Get Gain-of-Function Research Under Control?
In a party-line vote last evening, the U.S. Senate confirmed Stanford professor and medical researcher Jay Bhattacharya as director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
The confirmation of Bhattacharya—an early, prominent skeptic of COVID-era lockdowns and mandates—comes at a pivotal time for the NIH and its oversight of risky pandemic research.
There’s been a growing mainstream acceptance that the COVID-19 pandemic did in fact start in a Chinese lab as a result of risky gain-of-function research funded by the NIH. That’s fanned concerns that a future pandemic could start in a similar fashion should this kind of research not be brought under tighter control.
In the coming weeks, a new Biden administration-crafted regulatory framework intended to strengthen oversight of federal funding for risky pandemic research is scheduled to go into effect.
The White House is also reportedly planning to issue a more sweeping ban on federal funding of gain-of-function research, which Bhattacharya (as head of the agency that funds the vast majority of this research) would be largely responsible for enforcing.
Both the Obama administration and the first Trump administration tried to either pause or place some guardrails around federal funding of gain-of-function research. Yet both administration’s regulations
Article from Reason.com
The Reason Magazine website is a go-to destination for libertarians seeking cogent analysis, investigative reporting, and thought-provoking commentary. Championing the principles of individual freedom, limited government, and free markets, the site offers a diverse range of articles, videos, and podcasts that challenge conventional wisdom and advocate for libertarian solutions. Whether you’re interested in politics, culture, or technology, Reason provides a unique lens that prioritizes liberty and rational discourse. It’s an essential resource for those who value critical thinking and nuanced debate in the pursuit of a freer society.
