Study: Age-Verification Laws Don’t Work
Laws requiring porn websites to verify user ages and block people under age 18 have been spreading like a contagion around the United States. Proponents say they’re necessary to curb minors’ access to pornography, even if it means sacrificing adults’ privacy. Detractors argue that not only do these laws infringe on protected speech, they won’t even work at accomplishing their stated goal of stopping young people from viewing adult content. They may even make matters worse, by driving adults and minors alike to websites working outside of U.S. standards and regulations.
A new working paper suggests the detractors are right.
The paper details research looking at how age-verification laws impact “digital behavior across four key dimensions: searches for the largest compliant website, the largest non-compliant website, VPN services, and adult content generally.”
Since 2023, at least 18 states have adopted laws requiring websites that display sexually oriented content to essentially check IDs of all visitors. States requiring age verification for online adult content now include (in order of their laws passing) Louisiana, Utah, Mississippi, Arkansas, Virginia, Montana, Texas, North Carolina, Indiana, Idaho, Florida, Kentucky, Nebraska, Georgia, Alabama, Kansas, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Tennessee. These laws have already taken effect in all of these states except Georgia, which is set to start enforcing its age-verification law on July 1.
Researchers led by David Lang of Stanford University’s Polarization and Social Change Lab looked at Google Trends data from all of these states.
They found first that the passage of age-verification laws corresponded to a significant reduction in searchers for Pornhub, the dominant porn platform complying with these laws.
That’s what proponents of age-verification laws want, right?
Not so fast. The passage of such laws was also linked to significant increases in searches for XVideos, the dominant porn platform noncompliant with these laws.
The researchers also found age-verification laws linked to an increase in searches for virtual private network (VPN) services, which can mask a user’s location, thereby allowing people in states where age-verification laws exist to appear as if they’re visiting websites from within a state where no such laws exist.
“Our findings highlight that while these regulation efforts reduce traffic to compliant firms and likely a net reduction overall to this type of content, individuals adapt primarily by moving to content providers that do not require age verification,” states the paper.
“The three-month results demonstrate a 51% reduction in searches for the largest compliant platform, accompanied by increases in searches for the next largest non-compliant platform (48.1%) and VPN (23.6%) services,” it notes.
“We find that users in affected states simply shift their habits by searching for non-compliant sites or ways to circumvent the laws,” posted Zeve Sanderson, executive director of New York University’s Center for Social Media and Politics and one of the paper’s researchers, on X.
“While age-verification laws may successfully reduce traffic to regulated platforms, they also appear to drive users toward potentially less regulated & more dangerous alternatives,” Sanderson commented.
The researchers note in their paper that using Google Trend
Article from Reason.com
The Reason Magazine website is a go-to destination for libertarians seeking cogent analysis, investigative reporting, and thought-provoking commentary. Championing the principles of individual freedom, limited government, and free markets, the site offers a diverse range of articles, videos, and podcasts that challenge conventional wisdom and advocate for libertarian solutions. Whether you’re interested in politics, culture, or technology, Reason provides a unique lens that prioritizes liberty and rational discourse. It’s an essential resource for those who value critical thinking and nuanced debate in the pursuit of a freer society.
