“But Wouldn’t Warlords Take Over?” by Bob Murphy
https://mises.org/mises-daily/wouldnt-warlords-take-over
“The standard objection that anarchy would lead to battling warlords is unfounded. In those communities where such an outcome would occur, the addition of a State wouldn’t help. Indeed, the precise opposite is true: The voluntary arrangements of a private property society would be far more conducive to peace and the rule of law, than the coercive setup of a parasitical monopoly government.”
Thoughts?
Ideally one would imagine that it would be preferable to have a decentralized law enforcement in order to ensure that law enforcement agencies are ultimately responsible to the civil society they are tasked with protecting, rather than be ultimately responsible to the rulers.
submitted by /u/Derpballz
[link] [comments]
Article from r/Libertarian: For a Free Society
Posts from the /r/Libertarian subreddit which discusses libertarianism. It’s a libertarian sub, about libertarianism. Even if you are not a libertarian you are welcome to participate in good-faith discussion about libertarianism.