Ownership
Ownership it’s subjective It’s just an agreement between 2 or 3 parts, a buyer and a seller a buyer, a seller and society (usually the government) a deceased state and heirs a deceased State, Heirs and society (usually the government) Two or more players in a gamble Two or more players in a gamble and society (usually the government) a giver and a gifted
…No one owns anything if not purchased , gifted or produced/gained, we only own whatever other person or society have decided to sell us, gift us or admit that we earn it, ownership it’s nothing but an agreement And the price of anything it’s also subjective and determined by the market, which is also the agreement between 2 or more people
Based on this, is it possible to have an anarcho-capitalist society? Or is the government a necessary evil to be the one who determines who owns what
submitted by /u/NoChampionship2967
[link] [comments]
Article from r/Libertarian: For a Free Society