More Smoke And Mirrors: First FDA Approval of a Covid-19 Vaccine or Was It?
August 23, 2021: The U.S. Food & Drug Administration announces the Pfizer COVID-19 RNA vaccine has been approved and will be marketed under the trade name COMIRNATY for the prevention of Covid-19 disease in individuals 16-years of age and older.
This announcement is said to provide needed safety data to many people who were waiting to get vaccinated. Advocacy of vaccine hesitancy is now considered to be “misinformation” in the public square and is being censored in news reports.
However, the data used to gain FDA approval does not prove this RNA vaccine prevents infection, transmission or reduces the risk of hospitalization or death, which is what the public needs to know.
In order for a vaccine trial to measure prevention of transmission people have to be nasal swabbed twice a week for very long periods of time, which is impractical, and this obviously was not done. So, the claim of prevention is entirely without substantiation.
Risk of heart inflammation
The product insert for the newly approved Covid-19 Pfizer vaccine does warn of the risk for inflammation around the heart (pericarditis, myocarditis) with the highest risk among 12-17-year-old males. Of course, any serious side effect such as this among totally healthy young people, no matter how small the risk, would be of grave concern.
According to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System), there were 2,122 cases of myocarditis/pericarditis associated with vaccination in the period Dec. 4, 2020 to August 13, 2021, ~75% among presumably healthy younger to middle-aged Americans.
Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine takes time to develop antibodies and immunity. More precisely, the newly FDA-approved vaccine is reported to produce waning immunity, which declined from 96% to 84% four months after a second dose.
Vaccine-related deaths versus all-cause mortality
After six months, 15 vaccinated recipients and 14 placebo recipients died, with company evaluators deeming these deaths to be unrelated to the vaccine.
However, when it was revealed which subjects got vaccine or placebo, more deaths were reported in the vaccine group, for a total of 20 deaths among the vaccinated versus 14 in the placebo group. Vaccination did not reduce all-cause death. This is the shell game of vaccination. “The vaccine prevented your mother getting infected but died anyway.”
Just the process of vaccination in the placebo group in this study induced 36 cases of an adverse event that led to withdrawal from the study (32 in the vaccinated group). This is out of ~22,000 in each group (placebo and vaccine). T
The risk for an adverse event requiring withdrawal from the study was very small. But it is vaccine-induced since they also occurred among the placebo group, though we don’t have a third unvaccinated group for comparison. We also don’t know whether these deaths occurred in perfectly healthy young individuals, which would make them even more unacceptable.
Very small adverse event levels still affect thousands
Just 6 excess deaths out of 22,000 occurred in the vaccine group = 0.00027% or 2.7 per 100,000. Vaccinate all 328 million Americans and you end up with 8856 needless deaths over and above those who acquired natural immunity.
Even the lowest mortality rates associated with vaccination when calculated for the masses may end up in tragedy for thousands of unsuspecting people. How many of these deaths occurred among individuals with no co-morbidities (other diseases)? This is what needs to be known. Does the vaccine produce co-morbidities?
After the first shot immunity dropped so low over time that makers of this vaccine now recommend boosters.
A question arises: Would you buy a set of new tires where 16% of its tread wore off in six months and required re-treading (a booster shot)?
Product insert information is useless since individuals are being coerced or forced to vaccinate
Simply mentioning the serious side effect of heart inflammation in the product insert is of worthless value because subjects are being coerced to vaccinate rather than make a decision to inoculate based upon informed consent prior to immunization. Informed consent has been side-stepped because authorities say this is a life-and-death situation and informed consent is therefore waved. So legally, the vaccines are presumed to save lives before that is pro
Article from LewRockwell