Q-Anon, the Secular Faith That Won’t Die
I’ve written in the past about the Q-Anon phenomenon, something that I remained skeptical of but enjoyed like following from time to time like a supermarket tabloid; it has recently been declared a domestic terror organization and has also been attacked by the ADL and the World Jewish Congress, which I find is almost odd considering that “Q” had posted many times neoconservative oriented comments that attacked Iran. For example, from this one remaining site online currently devoted to Q-Anon (that is, the one site of which I am aware) that archives “his” “8Chan” and “8Kun” Q posts they included:
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: c75415 No.1809336 
Jun 19 2018 00:55:48 (EST)
Free Iran!!!
Fight
Fight
Fight
Regime change.
People have the power.
We stand with you.
Q
And regarding Israel:
>>613193
We are saving Israel for last.
Very specific reason not mentioned a single time.
Q
Of course, we never learned the “specific reason.” For what it’s worth, Sheldon’ Adelson’s widow doesn’t believe that Trump is an anti-Semite and proposed “that a new chapter be included in the Jewish bible, the Book of Trump.” I have no idea if she agrees with the ADL and WJC position on Q-Anon; perhaps she does.
Q-Anon never posted anything of consequence about the State of Israel, good or bad. To me, Q was deferential to Israel and Lew Rockwell recently posted on Political Theater an interesting article that “Q-Anon” might have been an FBI psy-op. (See here on Psychological Operations in general.) Blogger Caitlin Johnstone years ago quoted Julian Assange here saying reports disseminated by Q-Anon supporters that he had been set free (from the Ecuadoran Embassy), “Probably a black PR campaign amplified by CIA contractors to reduce the support for WikiLeaks.” I cannot say since I lack facts if Q had any links to any U.S. or foreign government, like a joint Israeli-British-CIA-FBI-Saudi operation (it seems Russiagate might have had its origins principally with the British) or Q-Anon was an example of the “free market” in action—something to support Trump and make money, but I suspect it was more sophisticated than that.
Yet even though followers were told to “trust the plan,” “trust Huber,” “tr
Article from LewRockwell
